SUPERCOMPUTING NEWS SUPERCOMPUTING NEWS
    • MEDIA KIT
    • MOST READ
    • RSS FEED
    • ACADEMIA
    • AEROSPACE
    • APPLICATIONS
    • ASTRONOMY
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • BIG DATA
    • BIOLOGY
    • CHEMISTRY
    • CLIENTS
    • CLOUD
    • DEFENSE
    • DEVELOPER TOOLS
    • EARTH SCIENCES
    • ECONOMICS
    • ENGINEERING
    • ENTERTAINMENT
    • GAMING
    • GOVERNMENT
    • HEALTH
    • OIL & GAS
    • INDUSTRY
    • INTERCONNECTS
    • MANUFACTURING
    • MIDDLEWARE
    • MOVIES
    • NETWORKS
    • PHYSICS
    • PROCESSORS
    • RETAIL
    • SCIENCE
    • STORAGE
    • SYSTEMS
    • VISUALIZATION
    • AcyMailing subscription form

    • ADD YOUR VIDEOS
    • MANAGE VIDEOS
    • CONVERSATION INBOX
    • SOCIAL ADVERTISER
    • SOCIAL NETWORK VIDEOS
    • SURVEYS
    • GROUPS
    • PAGES
    • MARKETPLACE LISTINGS
    • APPLICATIONS BROWSER
    • PRIVACY CONFIRM REQUEST
    • PRIVACY CREATE REQUEST
    • LEADERBOARD
    • POINTS LISTING
      • BADGES
    • TRADE SHOWS
Sign In
The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute
The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute
Supercomputing rewrites the timeline of planet formation at cosmic dawn
Supercomputing rewrites the timeline of planet formation at cosmic dawn
Supercomputers reveal four regimes of radiation damage in tungsten
Supercomputers reveal four regimes of radiation damage in tungsten
Computational radiative transfer reveals a gas-ensheathed black hole at cosmic dawn
Computational radiative transfer reveals a gas-ensheathed black hole at cosmic dawn
Supercomputers scan 165 years of weather data to find the ‘Snow-Eater’ heat waves behind Western US snowmelt
Supercomputers scan 165 years of weather data to find the ‘Snow-Eater’ heat waves behind Western US snowmelt
The stars that remember: Supercomputing reveals the hidden histories of massive binary systems
The stars that remember: Supercomputing reveals the hidden histories of massive binary systems
previous arrow
previous arrow
next arrow
next arrow
 
Shadow
The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute
Featured

The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute

CHRIS O'NEAL, PUBLISHER August 20, 2026, 10:00 am

Micron's new U.S. research initiative highlights a fundamental shift in AI and HPC: as accelerators become extraordinarily powerful, the ability to move, store, and feed data efficiently is becoming just as important as raw compute.

The race to build faster supercomputers has traditionally been measured in familiar numbers: FLOPS, accelerator counts, memory capacity, interconnect bandwidth and power consumption.

But the next major performance breakthrough may come from somewhere less glamorous.

Memory.

As artificial intelligence and high-performance computing workloads become increasingly data-intensive, the limiting factor is no longer necessarily how many calculations a processor can perform. Increasingly, it is whether the system can deliver the right data to the processor quickly enough to keep those calculations running.

That makes Micron Technology's announcement of Micron Research Labs, a U.S.-based long-horizon innovation hub, particularly relevant to the future of supercomputing. The initiative is designed to pursue research beyond today's memory products, including new memory devices and materials, advanced architectures, three-dimensional integration, heterogeneous systems, memory-centric computing and storage-class memory. 

For SuperComputing News, the important story isn't simply that Micron is opening another research operation.

The architecture of future supercomputers may increasingly be determined by what happens between the processor and the data.

The memory wall Is becoming a supercomputing problem

A modern accelerator can perform an extraordinary number of operations every second.

But computational throughput is useful only when the processor has data to work on.

This creates one of the fundamental challenges in computer architecture: the memory wall.

Processor performance has historically increased faster than memory latency. Meanwhile, AI workloads have introduced enormous quantities of parameters, activations, intermediate results and cached context that must constantly move through the system.

Micron itself now describes AI system performance as increasingly dependent on memory subsystem performance and capacity, elevating memory from a supporting component to a strategic element of the architecture. 

That shift has profound implications for HPC.

A supercomputer can contain thousands of GPUs, but if those GPUs spend too much time waiting for data, theoretical compute performance becomes increasingly disconnected from delivered application performance.

The question changes from: How many FLOPS can we build?

to: How efficiently can we feed those FLOPS?

AI has made the problem much bigger

Artificial intelligence has accelerated the memory challenge.

Training increasingly large models requires enormous amounts of compute and data.

Inference introduces a different problem: models must respond continuously to users and applications, often while maintaining increasingly large contexts.

Agentic AI pushes the requirements further by maintaining state and performing multiple operations over extended periods.

Micron says that as AI workloads evolve from training toward large-scale inference and agentic systems, memory capacity and bandwidth are becoming increasingly important. 

That matters to supercomputing because many of the same architectural pressures are appearing in scientific AI.

A climate model enhanced by machine learning.

A molecular simulation coupled with an AI surrogate.

A scientific foundation model analyzing astronomical observations.

A digital twin running continuously against real-time sensor data.

All of these workloads depend on moving enormous amounts of information efficiently.

From FLOPS to data movement

The conventional supercomputing race has often centered on floating-point performance.

But real applications rarely achieve theoretical peak performance.

Memory bandwidth, latency, cache behavior, interconnect performance, synchronization, and data locality can determine how much of the processor's theoretical capability actually reaches the scientific application.

This makes memory hierarchy increasingly important.

At one level are registers and caches.

Then comes high-bandwidth memory.

Then system DRAM.

Then increasingly sophisticated storage and data-management layers.

The challenge is to place the right data at the right level at the right time.

That sounds straightforward.

At exascale, it isn't.

HBM is only the beginning

High-bandwidth memory, or HBM, has become a critical technology for AI accelerators because it places large amounts of extremely high-bandwidth memory close to the processor.

Micron's current AI portfolio includes HBM3E and HBM4, alongside DRAM, LPDDR, GDDR and high-performance SSD technologies. 

The company's current HBM4 technology is positioned for next-generation AI data centers, with Micron citing up to 2.8 TB/s of bandwidth per stack. 

But the bigger question is what comes after today's HBM architectures.

That is where long-horizon research becomes important.

Micron Research Labs is intended to investigate technologies beyond current generations, including new materials and devices, advanced architectures, and three-dimensional integration. 

Why 3D memory matters

The physical distance between compute and memory matters.

The farther data must travel, the greater the latency and energy cost.

Three-dimensional integration offers one potential answer by allowing memory and compute technologies to be stacked or integrated more tightly.

Instead of treating the processor and memory as physically separate components communicating across a board, future architectures can increasingly bring them together.

For HPC, that could mean:

  • higher effective bandwidth;
  • lower data-movement latency;
  • improved energy efficiency;
  • greater memory density; and
  • potentially new ways of distributing computation.

The important point is that future performance may come not just from making transistors faster, but from shortening the distance between computation and information.

Memory-centric computing changes the architecture

Micron's research agenda explicitly includes memory-centric computing. 

That phrase deserves attention.

Traditional computer architecture is fundamentally compute-centric.

Data is moved to the processor.

The processor performs an operation.

The result is moved somewhere else.

But moving data can consume substantial energy and bandwidth.

Memory-centric approaches explore architectures in which computation occurs closer to where the data resides, reducing unnecessary movement.

For data-intensive scientific workloads, this could be transformative.

Imagine a simulation processing enormous arrays of data.

Instead of repeatedly moving those arrays between memory and distant processing units, some operations could potentially occur closer to the memory itself.

The result could be less traffic, lower energy consumption and greater effective application performance.

Supercomputing has an energy problem, too

Performance isn't the only issue.

Data movement consumes energy.

As HPC systems scale, energy efficiency becomes increasingly important because operating a massive supercomputer is ultimately constrained by power, cooling and facility infrastructure.

That creates a three-way optimization problem: Compute performance + memory performance + energy efficiency.

A processor that delivers twice the theoretical performance isn't necessarily twice as useful if feeding it requires disproportionately more energy.

Memory technologies therefore have the potential to improve computing efficiency without simply increasing the number of processors.

That could be especially important for future exascale and post-exascale systems.

Storage is moving closer to the compute conversation

The memory hierarchy also extends beyond DRAM and HBM.

Modern AI systems increasingly depend on fast storage for data ingestion, checkpointing, model loading and inference.

Micron's AI portfolio includes high-performance data-center NVMe SSDs designed for these workloads. 

That matters because the distinction between "memory" and "storage" is increasingly becoming an architectural question rather than a simple hardware category.

Large AI models may not fit entirely into the fastest memory.

Scientific datasets can be vastly larger than system memory.

Checkpointing enormous simulations can create substantial I/O loads.

Future systems therefore need intelligent movement of information across the entire hierarchy.

The HPC memory hierarchy of the future

The supercomputer of the future may look less like a collection of CPUs and GPUs connected to memory and more like an integrated data-processing fabric.

At the accelerator:

HBM → extremely high bandwidth

At the node:

DRAM → larger working capacity

Across the system:

network fabric → distributed memory and communication

Below the compute layer:

NVMe and emerging storage → massive datasets and persistent state

And surrounding all of it:

software → deciding where data should live and when it should move.

That final element is critical.

Hardware alone cannot solve the memory problem.

Compilers, runtimes, operating systems and application frameworks will have to understand increasingly complex memory hierarchies.

Micron itself identifies software-driven optimization as an important part of the future memory and storage landscape. 

Research today for systems that may not exist yet

This is where Micron's long-horizon strategy becomes particularly interesting.

The company says the new research organization will focus on technologies that could take years or even decades to reach commercial impact.

That is exactly the kind of research needed for next-generation supercomputing.

Today's systems were shaped by research decisions made years ago.

The architecture of tomorrow's exascale and post-exascale machines is being influenced by research happening now.

Materials scientists, device engineers, computer architects and software researchers are therefore working on problems whose eventual importance may not be obvious from today's products.

The memory system inside a future supercomputer may depend on ideas that are still laboratory experiments today.

The supercomputer is becoming a system of systems

There is a broader lesson here for the HPC community.

The processor can no longer be viewed in isolation.

Neither can memory.

Neither can networking.

Neither can storage.

The performance of a scientific application emerges from the interaction among all of them.

That is why the industry's attention is shifting toward system-level optimization.

Micron has described this explicitly, arguing that AI requires memory and compute to be designed together rather than treated as independent technologies. 

That principle applies equally to HPC.

A different definition of supercomputing performance

Suppose two systems have identical GPUs.

One has significantly better memory bandwidth and data locality.

The other has more powerful theoretical compute but spends more time waiting for data.

Which is the faster supercomputer?

For a real scientific application, the answer may be the first.

This is why benchmarks based solely on peak FLOPS can tell only part of the story.

Researchers increasingly care about time to solution, energy to solution and cost to solution.

Memory performance directly affects all three.

A better memory architecture can therefore make a system effectively more powerful without increasing its nominal compute capability.

Micron's Research bet fits a larger industry shift

Micron is not alone in recognizing the importance of memory.

The broader semiconductor industry is moving toward increasingly heterogeneous architectures in which CPUs, GPUs, specialized accelerators, HBM, networking and storage are engineered together.

Micron's recent work with AI infrastructure partners reflects the same trend. In June, the company announced a strategic agreement with Anthropic spanning memory and storage architecture design, supply and AI infrastructure. 

And Micron's current research agenda includes not only memory devices but architectures capable of supporting future AI and data-intensive computing. 

The direction is unmistakable.

Memory is becoming an architectural differentiator.

The next supercomputing race may be about moving less data

There is an intriguing possibility emerging from all of this.

The next generation of supercomputers may not win primarily by moving data faster.

They may win by moving less data in the first place.

That could mean:

  • computation closer to memory;
  • larger local memory pools;
  • smarter caching;
  • 3D integration;
  • compressed representations;
  • intelligent data placement;
  • memory-aware algorithms;
  • processing-in-memory techniques; and
  • tighter integration between compute, memory and storage.

The objective is simple:

Keep the computation close to the information it needs.

That could become one of the defining principles of post-exascale computing.

From more FLOPS to more useful FLOPS

The history of supercomputing is filled with breathtaking increases in theoretical performance.

But the ultimate goal has never been FLOPS for their own sake.

It is solving scientific problems faster.

If better memory architecture allows a climate simulation, molecular model or AI workload to complete in half the time while consuming less energy, that may be more valuable than simply adding another layer of compute.

This is why Micron's research initiative deserves attention from the HPC community.

It points toward a future in which memory is treated as part of the computing engine itself.

The road ahead

Micron's new research initiative is ultimately a bet on technologies that may define computing long after today's GPUs and accelerators have been replaced.

The company is investing in research spanning new materials and devices, advanced architectures, 3D integration, heterogeneous systems, memory-centric computing and storage-class memory. 

Not all of those technologies will necessarily become mainstream.

Some will fail.

Some will evolve into entirely different technologies.

But that is what long-horizon research is supposed to do: explore possibilities before the market knows which ones it will need.

And the need is becoming increasingly clear.

AI and HPC systems are producing extraordinary amounts of computation.

The next challenge is getting information to that computation efficiently enough to matter.

The future of supercomputing may depend on what happens between the FLOPS

The race for supercomputing supremacy has entered a transformative new phase. For years, the industry’s primary metric was raw computational capacity, how many operations a system could perform per second. Today, however, the focus has shifted toward efficiency: how much useful work can be accomplished per byte moved, per watt consumed, and per dollar invested. This transition places memory directly at the heart of the architectural conversation. 

Micron’s investment in long-horizon memory research is more than just a semiconductor story; it is a fundamental bet on the future of computing architecture. While next-generation supercomputers will undoubtedly feature an unprecedented number of accelerators, those processors will only achieve their true potential if the underlying architecture can reliably supply them with data. In the emerging era of AI and post-exaFLOPS computing, the next major performance breakthrough may not come from building a faster engine, but from building a better, more efficient road to deliver data to that engine. Ultimately, memory is that road.

 

Supercomputing rewrites the timeline of planet formation at cosmic dawn
Featured

Supercomputing rewrites the timeline of planet formation at cosmic dawn

Tyler O'Neal, Staff Editor August 18, 2026, 8:00 am

High-resolution simulations on the Austrian Scientific Cluster show that water-rich planetesimals could have formed around low-mass stars only about 100 million years after the Big Bang, far earlier than the conventional picture of planet formation might suggest.

The first stars did not merely illuminate the young Universe.

According to a new computational study, they may also have begun building planets almost immediately afterward.

Using detailed hydrodynamic simulations, researchers have modeled the evolution of a protoplanetary disk around a low-mass star formed from gas enriched by an earlier Population III pair-instability supernova. The calculations follow the transformation of primordial material into dust, the growth of that dust, the emergence of gravitational structures within the disk and, ultimately, the formation of planetesimals, the building blocks of planets.

The simulations were performed using the FEOSAD numerical framework on the Austrian Scientific Cluster (ASC). Rather than observing an ancient planetary system directly, the researchers have effectively reconstructed its formation computationally.

The result is remarkable: the models produce approximately 6 Earth masses of planetesimals over the simulated disk evolution, with a substantial fraction of the material water-rich.

For SuperComputing News, however, the most compelling aspect is not simply that the early Universe may have formed planets.

It is that high-resolution computation allows scientists to experiment on an era of cosmic history that no telescope can directly revisit.

A Planetary System Before the Solar System Had a Chance to Exist

The Universe was initially dominated by hydrogen and helium.

The heavier elements required for rocky planets, carbon, oxygen, silicon, iron, and others, were manufactured inside stars and distributed into space when those stars died.

That creates an obvious question: How quickly could planet formation begin?

The new simulations investigate one possible pathway.

A massive first-generation star undergoes a pair-instability supernova, enriching its surrounding environment with heavy elements. That material subsequently collapses to form a low-mass protostar and its surrounding disk.

The researchers then follow what happens inside that disk.

The simulation places this process at approximately 100 million years after the Big Bang.

That is extraordinarily early.

Yet the computation suggests that once even a modest amount of heavy elements becomes available, the basic machinery of planet formation may begin operating surprisingly quickly.

The Computer Becomes a Laboratory for Cosmic Dawn

There is no possibility of observing the formation of these particular systems directly.

They existed more than 13 billion years ago.

Instead, researchers must construct a numerical representation of the physical environment and allow the equations governing gas, dust, gravity, and chemistry to determine what happens.

The simulations use FEOSAD, a two-dimensional radiation-hydrodynamics code designed to model the evolution of protoplanetary disks.

The calculation simultaneously follows gas and dust while incorporating gravitational dynamics, heating and cooling, dust evolution, and the conversion of dust into planetesimals.

That combination makes the calculation substantially more than a simple orbital simulation.

It is an evolving multiphysics system.

Gas changes the gravitational environment.

Temperature influences the disk.

Dust grows and migrates.

Dust concentration changes the conditions for gravitational and aerodynamic instabilities.

And those instabilities can ultimately produce planetesimals.

The computer has to keep all of these processes interacting consistently.

Modeling a Cosmic Dawn Disk

The researchers simulate the disk using a 400 × 256 polar grid, following approximately 100,000 years of evolution.

Near the inner boundary, the spatial resolution reaches roughly 0.01 astronomical units.

That resolution is significant because the interesting physics occurs across vastly different spatial scales.

The disk itself extends across astronomical distances, while dust concentration and planetesimal formation involve much smaller structures.

A computational model therefore has to balance physical detail against the enormous cost of resolving the system.

This is one reason high-performance computing is so important to the work.

The simulation was performed on the Austrian Scientific Cluster, providing the computational resources needed to evolve the disk and its coupled physical processes.

From Supernova Debris to a Protostar

The simulation begins with material enriched by a Population III pair-instability supernova.

That material undergoes gravitational collapse.

Approximately 24,000 years after the beginning of the simulated collapse, a protostar forms, followed roughly 1,000 years later by the emergence of its disk.

This sequence is important.

The simulation isn’t simply inserting a mature protoplanetary disk into the early Universe.

It follows the transition toward the disk itself.

Once the disk develops, gravity begins shaping its structure.

By approximately 21,000 years after protostar formation, the model produces prominent spiral structures associated with gravitational instability.

Those spirals become part of the mechanism by which material moves through the disk.

The Chemistry of a Young Planetary System

The simulation also incorporates a chemical network specifically designed for low-metallicity environments.

The model includes 27 reactions involving primordial species such as hydrogen, molecular hydrogen, ionized hydrogen, negative hydrogen ions, deuterium, HD, and electrons.

That chemistry matters because the thermal evolution of the gas affects the dynamics of the disk.

Temperature influences pressure.

Pressure influences gravitational stability.

And temperature and density also influence how dust behaves.

The researchers use numerical root-finding procedures, including Newton-Raphson iteration with bisection fallback, to solve the energy equation within the simulation.

This is a useful reminder that a modern astrophysical simulation is not one equation running on a computer.

It is a tightly coupled numerical system in which chemistry, thermodynamics, radiation, and gravity continually interact.

The Critical Transition: Dust Becomes Planetary Building Material

Planets don’t form directly from a diffuse gas disk.

Small solid particles first have to grow.

Those particles can collide and stick, becoming progressively larger grains.

Eventually, however, another problem emerges.

If particles simply grow and drift inward toward the star, much of the solid material could disappear before becoming planets.

One of the mechanisms that can overcome this problem is the streaming instability.

When solids become sufficiently concentrated relative to the gas, aerodynamic interactions can amplify those concentrations.

The resulting dense regions can collapse into much larger solid body planetesimals.

The simulation explicitly follows the dust evolution and evaluates the conditions under which streaming instability can occur.

This is the computational bridge between microscopic dust grains and the first genuine planetary building blocks.

Six Earth Masses of Planetesimals

The most dramatic result emerges during the later stages of the calculation.

The modeled disk produces approximately six Earth masses of planetesimals before luminosity bursts terminate the planetesimal-formation phase at roughly 37,000 years.

Put another way, the simulation does not merely show that dust can survive around an early low-mass star.

It demonstrates a pathway by which that dust can become a substantial reservoir of solid planetary material.

And it happens astonishingly quickly on cosmic timescales.

The Universe has barely begun its evolution when the computational model is already producing the ingredients for planetary systems.

These May Have Been Water-Rich Worlds

Perhaps the most intriguing aspect is the composition.

The modeled disk is substantially enriched in oxygen-bearing material, and its H₂O mass fraction is only a few times lower than that of the present-day Solar System.

That opens an extraordinary possibility.

Some of the first planetary building blocks in the Universe may not have been dry, primitive rocks.

They could have contained significant amounts of water.

Of course, the simulation does not demonstrate that habitable planets actually formed.

It demonstrates something more fundamental: the physical conditions necessary for producing water-rich planetesimals may have existed remarkably early.

A Computationally Visible Planet-Formation Factory

The simulation provides researchers with something impossible to obtain observationally: a detailed movie of the formation process.

The calculation can be inspected at different times to determine:

  • where gas accumulates;
  • where spiral structures emerge;
  • where dust concentrates;
  • how dust migrates;
  • when gravitational instability develops;
  • where streaming instability becomes possible; and
  • how much planetesimal material ultimately forms.

The simulation therefore acts as a kind of virtual laboratory for planetary formation at cosmic dawn.

Researchers can ask “what if?” questions that cannot be posed observationally.

What happens if the metallicity changes?

What happens if the stellar mass changes?

What happens if the initial disk conditions differ?

What happens to the water fraction?

What happens to the planetesimal mass?

Those experiments can be performed numerically.

Why High-Performance Computing Changes the Question

The important distinction is that the researchers are not using computation merely to process observations.

The simulation itself is producing new scientific knowledge.

Without numerical modeling, there is no direct way to watch a low-metallicity disk evolve for tens of thousands of years while simultaneously tracking its gas, dust, chemistry, gravitational instability, and planetesimal formation.

That makes this a particularly strong supercomputing story.

The computer isn’t an accessory.

It is the experimental apparatus.

A Multiscale Problem in Space and Time

Planet formation is inherently multiscale.

A star forms from material distributed across astronomical distances.

A disk develops spiral structures on scales of fractions of astronomical units to many AU.

Dust grains are microscopic.

The streaming instability concentrates those grains into dense regions.

Planetesimals eventually become kilometer-scale bodies.

The simulation has to represent these processes within one computational framework.

The 400 × 256 grid and approximately 0.01-AU inner resolution provide the numerical resolution needed to follow the relevant disk dynamics while maintaining a computationally manageable domain.

This is exactly the kind of compromise that defines computational astrophysics: enough resolution to capture the physics, enough scale to capture the system.

The First Planetary Systems May Have Been Surprisingly Fast

The findings challenge an intuitive assumption about cosmic evolution.

It is tempting to imagine the early Universe as a chemically primitive place in which planets could not emerge until much later generations of stars had enriched the cosmos.

The simulation presents a more complicated picture.

Once a first generation of massive stars has produced heavy elements, subsequent star-forming environments may acquire enough material for dust and planetesimal formation surprisingly quickly.

The study therefore suggests that the Universe may have begun producing planetary building blocks far earlier than conventional expectations based on later-generation planetary systems might imply.

And the computation puts a timescale on that possibility.

From the First Stars to the First Worlds

There is a beautiful sequence hidden inside the numerical experiment:

First stars → supernova → heavy elements → gravitational collapse → low-mass star → disk → dust → instability → planetesimals.

Each step is connected to the next.

The supernova provides the raw ingredients.

Gravity concentrates them.

The disk organizes them.

Dust evolution converts atomic material into solids.

Instabilities concentrate those solids.

And eventually, planetesimals emerge.

The simulation allows researchers to watch that chain unfold.

The Bigger Supercomputing Story

This research demonstrates why astrophysical simulations are becoming increasingly important as telescopes push farther back toward the beginning of cosmic history.

Observatories such as JWST can reveal ancient galaxies and stars.

But they cannot rewind the Universe and watch those systems form.

Numerical models can.

They allow scientists to reconstruct plausible histories and test whether the laws of physics permit particular structures to emerge under early-Universe conditions.

In this case, the answer appears to be yes.

Planetary building blocks may have emerged almost as soon as the Universe became chemically capable of making them.

Computing a Planetary Future in the Young Universe

There is an inspiring irony to this study: researchers are using humanity’s most advanced computing technology to investigate a period when the universe possessed almost none of the complexity we associate with the modern era. High-performance simulations act as a virtual laboratory, reconstructing the moment when simple atoms began transitioning into stars, protoplanetary disks, and the raw materials for worlds. 

These findings challenge the assumption that planet formation was a late development in cosmic history; instead, it may have been one of the universe’s earliest acts of chemical complexity. The simulations demonstrate that a low-mass star could form just 100 million years after the Big Bang, spawning a disk capable of producing substantial quantities of planetesimals. Furthermore, because these disks were surprisingly rich in water-bearing material, these early building blocks may have been far more dynamic than the dry, primitive rocks one might expect from the early universe. Ultimately, while the first worlds may have formed in the silence of the cosmic dawn, it took the power of a supercomputer to finally bring that process to light.

Supercomputers reveal four regimes of radiation damage in tungsten
Featured

Supercomputers reveal four regimes of radiation damage in tungsten

Deckard, Staff Editor August 17, 2026, 12:00 pm

Machine-learning molecular dynamics on the LUMI supercomputer reaches the 2-MeV regime with billion-atom simulations, revealing how tungsten responds to the extreme particle bombardment expected inside future fusion reactors.

For decades, scientists have understood the basic mechanism by which energetic particles damage metals: a high-energy particle strikes an atom, knocking it from its lattice site and triggering a rapidly expanding collision cascade. But understanding the first few trillionths of a second of that event in a material as important as tungsten is considerably harder than the basic description suggests.

Now, researchers from the University of Helsinki, Åbo Akademi University and CSC–IT Center for Science have used machine-learning-driven molecular dynamics at unprecedented scale to follow radiation-damage cascades in tungsten from just 40 electronvolts to 2 megaelectronvolts.

The calculations reached systems containing up to one billion tungsten atoms and were performed on the GPU nodes of Europe's LUMI supercomputer. The simulations reveal, for the first time, a complete progression through four distinct regimes of primary radiation damage, including a previously inaccessible high-energy regime in which defect production returns to a linear relationship with deposited energy.

It is a remarkable demonstration of what happens when machine learning, GPU computing, and molecular dynamics are combined at extreme scale.

And for fusion research, the result could provide a more accurate computational foundation for predicting how reactor materials deteriorate under neutron bombardment.

Tungsten meets the fusion environment

Tungsten is one of the leading candidates for the plasma-facing components of future fusion reactors.

Its appeal is straightforward: it has an exceptionally high melting point and can withstand extreme thermal and radiation environments.

But the same fusion reactions that produce energy also create an extraordinarily hostile particle environment.

A deuterium-tritium fusion reaction produces a 14.1-MeV neutron. When those neutrons strike tungsten, they can transfer as much as approximately 300 keV of recoil energy to tungsten atoms.

That recoil initiates a cascade.

One displaced atom strikes another.

That atom displaces another.

Within an incredibly short period, hundreds, thousands, or potentially many more atoms can be pushed away from their normal lattice positions.

The resulting vacancies, self-interstitial atoms, dislocation loops, and defect clusters ultimately contribute to swelling, embrittlement, and other forms of material degradation.

For fusion engineers, predicting primary damage accurately is essential.

For computational scientists, however, there is a problem.

The cascade is enormous.

The computational wall

Molecular dynamics is one of the most powerful tools available for studying radiation damage because it follows atoms individually according to the underlying interatomic forces.

But that precision comes at a price.

At relatively low recoil energies, a simulation containing thousands or millions of atoms can be sufficient.

At higher energies, the collision cascade becomes physically larger.

A simulation box that is too small causes the cascade to interact with its own boundaries, contaminating the physics.

Before this work, full atomistic simulations had reached approximately 300 keV, enough to cover the fusion-neutron energy range but leaving the behavior at MeV energies largely unexplored computationally.

Experiments, meanwhile, routinely investigate MeV-scale recoil energies using heavy-ion irradiation.

That created a significant gap between what experimentalists could produce and what computational scientists could model atom by atom.

The new work attacks that gap directly.

One billion atoms at a time

The researchers simulated primary knock-on atom, or PKA, energies spanning six orders of magnitude, from 40 eV to 2 MeV.

At the highest energies, the simulation cells contained approximately 1.024 billion tungsten atoms in a cube about 255 nanometers on each side. Twenty independent simulations were performed at each of the 1- and 2-MeV energies.

The progression in system size is striking.

At 50 keV, the calculations used about 8.2 million atoms.

At 100 keV, approximately 16 million.

At 200 keV, 54 million.

At 300–500 keV, 128 million.

And at 1–2 MeV:

more than one billion atoms.

This is not simply a bigger simulation.

It represents a fundamentally different computational regime.

Machine learning makes the scale possible

The breakthrough depends heavily on the interatomic potential.

Traditional molecular-dynamics calculations require an accurate description of the forces between atoms while evaluating those forces millions or billions of times during a simulation.

The researchers used tabGAP, a tabulated Gaussian Approximation Potential, a machine-learned interatomic potential designed to provide high computational efficiency while retaining the accuracy needed for atomistic materials modeling.

They ported the LAMMPS implementation of tabGAP to GPUs using the Kokkos performance-portability framework.

This is where the study becomes particularly interesting from an HPC perspective.

The researchers weren't simply given a larger computer.

They redesigned the computational workload to exploit modern accelerator hardware.

The force calculation was parallelized over atoms, and the GPU implementation achieved a 1.6× speedup on a single AMD MI250X GPU GCD compared with the original CPU implementation running on a full LUMI CPU node containing 128 AMD EPYC 7763 cores.

The electronic-stopping calculation used during the high-energy cascades was also ported to Kokkos, allowing the frequently executed cascade calculations to run on GPUs.

This is a powerful example of modern HPC optimization:

better physics + better algorithms + accelerator computing = a previously inaccessible simulation regime.

Following a cascade for 50 picoseconds

The simulations begin with a tungsten lattice relaxed to 300 kelvin and zero pressure.

A primary recoil is then launched into the material.

Because the collision evolves extremely rapidly, the researchers use an adaptive timestep and follow the cascade for 50 picoseconds.

A thin, 8-ångström boundary region is thermostatted at 300 K using a Nosé-Hoover thermostat. This boundary treatment removes heat and damps pressure waves so that the cascade does not artificially interact with the simulation boundary.

At high recoil energies, another physical effect becomes important: the energetic atoms can lose energy to electronic excitations.

The researchers model that electronic stopping as a friction force for atoms above 10 eV using stopping data from SRIM.

Every detail matters.

When a billion-atom calculation is being used to make predictions about a fusion reactor, numerical artifacts can be as dangerous as missing physics.

Turning atoms into data

The raw molecular-dynamics trajectories contain enormous quantities of information.

The researchers needed to determine which atoms had been displaced, where vacancies and self-interstitial atoms formed, how defects clustered and whether dislocations developed.

They used several computational analysis techniques:

* Wigner-Seitz analysis to identify vacancies and self-interstitial atoms;
* the Dislocation Extraction Algorithm (DXA) to identify dislocations;
* cluster analysis to determine defect-cluster sizes; and
* OVITO for analysis and visualization.

The resulting dataset allows the researchers to move beyond simply asking how many atoms were displaced.

They can investigate the morphology of the cascade.

That turns out to be crucial.

Four regimes hidden inside the cascade

The simulations reveal four distinct regimes of radiation damage.

Regime I: Near the displacement threshold

At very low energies, the recoil may barely have enough energy to permanently displace atoms.

The minimum tungsten displacement energy is approximately 42 ± 1 eV for certain crystallographic directions, while the average threshold over directions is approximately 95 eV and the maximum exceeds 250 eV.

Interestingly, the simulations show that around 80–130 eV, only about 0.25 Frenkel pairs are produced per recoil on average.

Even when an atom is displaced, many defects subsequently recombine.

Regime II: The sublinear heat-spike regime

As recoil energy increases, conventional collision cascades generate increasingly intense local heating.

The cascade forms a microscopic heat spike, a dense, transient region that behaves somewhat like a tiny volume of hot liquid.

This promotes recombination.

Consequently, the number of surviving defects grows more slowly than the deposited energy.

The simulations agree well with established arc-dpa-based modeling in this regime.

But then something unexpected happens.

Regime III: The superlinear regime

At approximately 20–30 keV, the behavior changes.

Subcascades begin to form, but they don't necessarily separate cleanly.

Instead, many remain close enough for their heat spikes to overlap.

The result can be an extraordinarily dense region of energy deposition.

The simulations show that these compact or overlapping cascades create anomalously large defect clusters and more surviving defects than predicted by the conventional models.

The researchers identify a heat-spike radius of roughly 3 nanometers at the transition.

This produces a superlinear increase in damage.

In other words, adding more energy doesn't simply produce proportionally more damage.

Under these conditions, the cascade becomes unusually efficient at producing persistent defects.

The computer recreates a microscopic explosion

The visualization of these simulations is extraordinary.

At 20 keV, the cascade remains relatively compact.

At 200 keV, overlapping subcascades become apparent.

At 2 MeV, the simulation reveals a much larger structure in which multiple subcascades evolve and eventually separate.

The researchers analyze the cascades at femtosecond and picosecond timescales, capturing both the initial energetic collisions and the later heat-spike evolution.

The computational scale is enormous, but the physical event itself is fleeting.

The entire primary-damage process unfolds in a fraction of a nanosecond.

Supercomputing effectively provides a microscope for time as well as space.

Regime IV: The Linear Frontier

The biggest discovery comes above approximately 300 keV.

At these energies, subcascades increasingly separate far enough that they no longer overlap.

The dense heat spikes responsible for the superlinear regime stop becoming progressively more extreme.

Instead, the energy is divided among increasingly independent subcascades.

The defect production therefore returns to a linear trend.

This is the first time the high-energy linear regime has been directly revealed and quantified in atomistic tungsten simulations.

And the energy is significant.

Approximately 300 keV is also the maximum recoil energy tungsten can receive from a 14.1-MeV fusion neutron.

That coincidence is extremely useful for fusion research.

It means the new simulations identify the transition right at the upper edge of the primary radiation-damage regime most directly relevant to a fusion reactor.

Why the transition matters

The distinction between the four regimes isn't merely academic.

Most engineering models need to convert radiation energy into an estimate of the number of defects created.

If the damage is assumed to increase linearly when it is actually superlinear, defect production could be underestimated.

If the superlinear behavior is incorrectly extrapolated indefinitely, it could instead be overestimated at higher energies.

The new simulations show that neither assumption is correct across the full energy range.

There is a superlinear window.

Then, as the subcascades separate, the physics changes again.

A new full-range damage model

The researchers use the computational results to construct a revised analytical model covering all four regimes.

The model combines the established arc-dpa formulation with a new energy-dependent enhancement function.

That enhancement function rises through the superlinear regime and then saturates as the system approaches the high-energy linear regime.

The resulting model reproduces the simulated trend from near-threshold energies through the sublinear and superlinear regimes and into the newly observed linear high-energy regime.

This is where an extreme-scale simulation becomes useful to engineers.

The goal isn't to run a billion-atom calculation every time someone wants to estimate radiation damage in a reactor component.

The goal is to use those simulations to build better reduced-order models that can be incorporated into larger materials and reactor simulations.

Billion atoms, but only 50 picoseconds

One of the most fascinating aspects of the research is the mismatch between spatial and temporal scale.

The highest-energy simulations contain one billion atoms.

Yet each cascade is followed for only about 50 picoseconds.

That's because primary radiation damage happens extraordinarily quickly.

The simulation therefore represents a massive three-dimensional computational domain evolving over an almost unimaginably short interval.

This is exactly the kind of workload that modern supercomputers are uniquely suited to handle.

Thousands or millions of atom interactions must be calculated repeatedly while maintaining enough spatial resolution to prevent the cascade from interacting artificially with the boundaries.

Artificial heat spikes confirm the physics

The team also performed controlled simulations in which kinetic energy was artificially deposited into a spherical region of tungsten.

These experiments effectively created idealized microscopic heat spikes.

The researchers ran 20 independent simulations at several energies, including 2, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 keV.

Above approximately 30 keV, these artificial heat spikes reproduced the same qualitative transition toward superlinear defect production seen in the full cascade simulations.

That provides an important computational cross-check.

The billion-atom cascade calculations suggest that unusually dense energy deposition is responsible for the superlinear regime.

The artificial experiments isolate that mechanism.

Together, the two approaches strengthen the physical interpretation.

Defects become nanometer-scale structures

The simulations also reveal the physical structures behind the changing damage rate.

The largest defect clusters that frequently form directly in pristine bulk tungsten contain on the order of 1,000 vacancies or self-interstitial atoms.

Depending on morphology, those clusters can span approximately 4–10 nanometers.

At high energies, almost all self-interstitial atoms become part of clusters, while approximately 60% of vacancies are clustered.

Those clusters can include void-like vacancy cores and large dislocation structures.

The computer is therefore doing more than counting defects.

It is revealing the nanoscale architecture of damage.

LUMI becomes part of the physics experiment

The calculations were performed on LUMI, the EuroHPC supercomputer hosted by CSC in Finland.

The GPU implementation of tabGAP was specifically optimized for the accelerator architecture, and the researchers' supplemental data identify the GPU-hours associated with individual cascade simulations.

The work was also carried out partly through the EUROfusion E-TASC Advanced Computing Hub, with access to LUMI awarded by the University of Helsinki.

This is a useful reminder that today's scientific discoveries increasingly depend on the interaction between researchers and computing infrastructure.

The supercomputer isn't simply a place where the calculations happen.

The architecture of the machine shapes which scientific questions can be asked.

The bigger HPC lesson

The most exciting part of this research may ultimately have little to do with tungsten alone.

The work demonstrates a general strategy for computational science:

Use machine learning to make a high-fidelity physical model computationally affordable, optimize it for GPUs, scale the simulation to unprecedented system sizes, and then use the resulting data to discover physics that smaller simulations cannot see.

That strategy is appearing across materials science, fusion, chemistry, astrophysics and climate modeling.

Here, it has pushed molecular dynamics into a regime that was previously inaccessible.

The result isn't simply a faster calculation.

It is a new observation.

From simulation to fusion reactor

Fusion reactor designers ultimately need to know how materials behave over years of neutron exposure.

No computer can simulate every atom in a reactor wall for the reactor's entire operating lifetime.

Instead, scientists need a hierarchy of models.

Atomistic simulations describe the earliest stages of radiation damage.

Those results feed mesoscale models.

Those models inform materials-property predictions.

And those predictions eventually feed reactor-scale simulations and engineering decisions.

The quality of the entire hierarchy depends partly on whether its lowest-level physics is correct.

That is why the new billion-atom calculations matter.

They provide data in a previously inaccessible energy range and reveal that the conventional picture needs to account for four regimes rather than a simple progression from sublinear to linear behavior.

Computing the future of fusion materials

The research characterizes four distinct regimes of radiation-induced damage in tungsten, utilizing billion-atom molecular dynamics simulations to track defect evolution from the displacement threshold to the megaelectronvolt range. By elucidating the transition from sublinear heat-spike effects to superlinear clustering and eventual linear growth at high energies, this study provides a more accurate computational framework for predicting material degradation. These findings enable a refined understanding of tungsten performance, facilitating the optimization of plasma-facing components for the extreme conditions inherent in future fusion reactors.

  • Computational radiative transfer reveals a gas-ensheathed black hole at cosmic dawn
  • 1
  • 2
Page 1 of 2
POPULAR RIGHT NOW
  • Supercomputers uncover a new class of cosmic explosions hidden in plain sight
    Supercomputers uncover a new class of cosmic explosions hidden in plain sight
  • AI supercharges the hunt for stronger magnets: Iowa State researchers launch a new era of intelligent materials discovery
    AI supercharges the hunt for stronger magnets: Iowa State researchers launch a new era of intelligent materials discovery
  • IBM's Historic stock collapse raises questions for the future of enterprise supercomputing
    IBM's Historic stock collapse raises questions for the future of enterprise supercomputing
  • Could a novel dark matter theory simultaneously resolve multiple cosmic enigmas? Supercomputer simulations provide a compelling, albeit currently unverified, potential solution
    Could a novel dark matter theory simultaneously resolve multiple cosmic enigmas? Supercomputer simulations provide a compelling, albeit currently unverified, potential solution
  • Melting icebergs may be reshaping Earth’s greatest ocean current
    Melting icebergs may be reshaping Earth’s greatest ocean current
  • Supercomputers replace ‘bathtub’ flood maps with physics-based digital twins of Britain’s coastline
    Supercomputers replace ‘bathtub’ flood maps with physics-based digital twins of Britain’s coastline
  • Supercomputers push neural quantum simulation beyond previous limits
    Supercomputers push neural quantum simulation beyond previous limits
  • Intel’s AI supercomputing revival: Q2 financial surge signals new era for CPU-powered HPC infrastructure
    Intel’s AI supercomputing revival: Q2 financial surge signals new era for CPU-powered HPC infrastructure
  • AI infrastructure financing fears shake semiconductor sector
    AI infrastructure financing fears shake semiconductor sector
  • AWS supercomputing investment reaches historic scale as Amazon’s AI strategy powers record financial results
    AWS supercomputing investment reaches historic scale as Amazon’s AI strategy powers record financial results
THIS YEAR'S MOST READ
  • Wall Street wants to trade supercomputing power like oil
    Wall Street wants to trade supercomputing power like oil
  • Cosmic ambition at scale: UK’s supercomputer unlocks a 2.5 petabytes universe
    Cosmic ambition at scale: UK’s supercomputer unlocks a 2.5 petabytes universe
  • Hidden order, revealed at scale: Supercomputing, electron ptychography uncover the inner workings of relaxor ferroelectrics
    Hidden order, revealed at scale: Supercomputing, electron ptychography uncover the inner workings of relaxor ferroelectrics
  • Beamforming the future: BeammWave's 6G push signals the rise of orbital-terrestrial wireless networks
    Joakim Axmon
    Joakim Axmon
  • Intel's Q1 results signal supercomputing surge driving Xeon momentum
    Intel's Q1 results signal supercomputing surge driving Xeon momentum
  • When stars fall apart: Supercomputing reveals the hidden physics of black holes
    When stars fall apart: Supercomputing reveals the hidden physics of black holes
  • Multi-layer simulations reveal the hidden supply chain of solar prominences
    Multi-layer simulations reveal the hidden supply chain of solar prominences
  • Japanese scientists decode dolphin speed with supercomputing: Turbulence, vortices, and the hidden physics of propulsion
    Japanese scientists decode dolphin speed with supercomputing: Turbulence, vortices, and the hidden physics of propulsion
  • Cosmic feedback at scale: Supercomputing reveals how quasars regulate the early Universe
    Cosmic feedback at scale: Supercomputing reveals how quasars regulate the early Universe
  • Modeling life at the microscopic scale: A computational breakthrough in oxygen transport
    Modeling life at the microscopic scale: A computational breakthrough in oxygen transport
MOST READ OF ALL-TIME
  • Largest Computational Biology Simulation Mimics The Ribosome
    Details
    112089
    The amino acid (green) slithers into the chemical reaction center, moving through an evolutionarily ancient corridor of the ribosome (purple). The amino acid is delivered to the reaction core by the transfer RNA molecule (yellow).
    The amino acid (green) slithers into the chemical reaction center, moving through an evolutionarily ancient corridor of the ribosome (purple). The amino acid is delivered to the reaction core by the transfer RNA molecule (yellow).
  • Silicon 'neurons' may add a new dimension to chips
    Details
    80962
    Silicon 'neurons' may add a new dimension to chips
  • Linux Networx Accelerators Expected to Drive up to 4x Price/Performance
    Details
    75522
  • Complex Concepts That Really Add Up
    Details
    73609
    Complex Concepts That Really Add Up
  • Blue Sky Studios Donates Animation SuperComputer to Wesleyan
    Details
    68125
    Each rack holds 52 Angstrom Microsystem-brand “blades,” with a memory footprint of 12 or 24 gigabytes each. (Photos by Olivia Bartlett Drake)
    Each rack holds 52 Angstrom Microsystem-brand “blades,” with a memory footprint of 12 or 24 gigabytes each. (Photos by Olivia Bartlett Drake)
  • Humanities, HPC connect at NERSC
    Details
    57930
  • TeraGrid ’09 'Call for Participation'
    Details
    54933
  • Turbulence responsible for black holes' balancing act
    Details
    52295
  • Cray Wins $52 Million SuperComputer Contract
    Details
    50125
  • SDSC Researchers Accurately Predict Protein Docking
    Details
    46058
  • FRONTPAGE
  • LATEST
  • POPULAR
  • REGISTER
  • SOCIAL
  • VIDEO
  • SUBSCRIPTION
  • RSS
  • GUIDELINES
  • PRIVACY
  • TOS
  • ABOUT
  • +1 (816) 799-4488
  • editorial@supercomputingonline.com
© 2001 - 2026 SuperComputingOnline.com, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Sign In
  • FRONT PAGE
  • LATEST
    • MEDIA KIT
    • MOST READ
    • RSS FEED
    • ACADEMIA
    • AEROSPACE
    • APPLICATIONS
    • ASTRONOMY
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • BIG DATA
    • BIOLOGY
    • CHEMISTRY
    • CLIENTS
    • CLOUD
    • DEFENSE
    • DEVELOPER TOOLS
    • EARTH SCIENCES
    • ECONOMICS
    • ENGINEERING
    • ENTERTAINMENT
    • HEALTH
    • INDUSTRY
    • INTERCONNECTS
    • GAMING
    • GOVERNMENT
    • MANUFACTURING
    • MIDDLEWARE
    • MOVIES
    • NETWORKS
    • OIL & GAS
    • PHYSICS
    • PROCESSORS
    • RETAIL
    • SCIENCE
    • STORAGE
    • SYSTEMS
    • VISUALIZATION
  • VIDEOS
    • ADD YOUR VIDEOS
    • MANAGE VIDEOS
  • COMMUNITY
    • TRADE SHOWS
    • SOCIAL NETWORK VIDEOS
    • SURVEYS
    • APPLICATIONS BROWSER
    • CONVERSATION INBOX
    • SOCIAL ADVERTISER
    • GROUPS
    • MARKETPLACE LISTINGS
    • PAGES
    • LEADERBOARD
    • POINTS LISTING
      • BADGES
    • PRIVACY CONFIRM REQUEST
    • PRIVACY CREATE REQUEST

Hey there! We noticed you’re using an ad blocker.