SUPERCOMPUTING NEWS SUPERCOMPUTING NEWS
    • MEDIA KIT
    • MOST READ
    • RSS FEED
    • ACADEMIA
    • AEROSPACE
    • APPLICATIONS
    • ASTRONOMY
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • BIG DATA
    • BIOLOGY
    • CHEMISTRY
    • CLIENTS
    • CLOUD
    • DEFENSE
    • DEVELOPER TOOLS
    • EARTH SCIENCES
    • ECONOMICS
    • ENGINEERING
    • ENTERTAINMENT
    • GAMING
    • GOVERNMENT
    • HEALTH
    • OIL & GAS
    • INDUSTRY
    • INTERCONNECTS
    • MANUFACTURING
    • MIDDLEWARE
    • MOVIES
    • NETWORKS
    • PHYSICS
    • PROCESSORS
    • RETAIL
    • SCIENCE
    • STORAGE
    • SYSTEMS
    • VISUALIZATION
    • AcyMailing subscription form

    • ADD YOUR VIDEOS
    • MANAGE VIDEOS
    • CONVERSATION INBOX
    • SOCIAL ADVERTISER
    • SOCIAL NETWORK VIDEOS
    • SURVEYS
    • GROUPS
    • PAGES
    • MARKETPLACE LISTINGS
    • APPLICATIONS BROWSER
    • PRIVACY CONFIRM REQUEST
    • PRIVACY CREATE REQUEST
    • LEADERBOARD
    • POINTS LISTING
      • BADGES
    • TRADE SHOWS
Sign In
NVIDIA's $96.2 billion quarter redefines the supercomputing economy
NVIDIA's $96.2 billion quarter redefines the supercomputing economy
When physics computes: Simulations turn random skyrmion motion into directional information
When physics computes: Simulations turn random skyrmion motion into directional information
Supercomputing reveals why some black hole flares fade away
Supercomputing reveals why some black hole flares fade away
The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute
The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute
Supercomputing rewrites the timeline of planet formation at cosmic dawn
Supercomputing rewrites the timeline of planet formation at cosmic dawn
Supercomputers reveal four regimes of radiation damage in tungsten
Supercomputers reveal four regimes of radiation damage in tungsten
previous arrow
previous arrow
next arrow
next arrow
 
Shadow
NVIDIA's $96.2 billion quarter redefines the supercomputing economy
Featured

NVIDIA's $96.2 billion quarter redefines the supercomputing economy

Deckard, Staff Editor August 26, 2026, 4:00 pm

With Data Center revenue reaching $89 billion, up 117% year over year, NVIDIA's latest results show that accelerated computing is no longer a specialized segment of the technology industry. It is becoming the economic foundation of a new generation of supercomputing infrastructure, and memory may be the component that determines how expensive that future becomes.

While the supercomputing industry historically gauged progress through performance metrics such as teraFLOPS, petaFLOPS, and exaFLOPS, NVIDIA's recent financial results indicate a shift toward a new performance indicator: revenue generation per unit of compute.

NVIDIA reported quarterly revenue of $96.2 billion, a significant 106% year-over-year increase, with Data Center revenue accounting for $89.0 billion, up 117% year-over-year and 18% sequentially. Alongside a 75% gross margin and $59.7 billion in GAAP net income, these figures underscore the rapid transition of accelerated computing from specialized HPC laboratories to the fundamental infrastructure supporting global AI production. 

With projected revenue of $108 billion for the fiscal third quarter and a consistent 74% gross margin, NVIDIA shows no signs of decelerating. This period of rapid expansion, however, presents a significant challenge: as the global demand for computational power increases, the costs of the critical components required to support that infrastructure are rising in tandem.

Compute Has Become the Infrastructure

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang summarized the transformation bluntly: “Now, compute is revenue.”

The company says AI infrastructure is now being built at full speed, with its Vera Rubin platform entering full production.

That statement represents a profound change for HPC.

For decades, computing was largely treated as a capital expense supporting another business.

Now computing itself is becoming an economic asset.

AI companies sell inference.

Cloud providers sell accelerated compute.

Scientific institutions consume GPU cycles.

Enterprises build private AI infrastructure.

Governments are building sovereign AI systems.

And supercomputing centers increasingly combine traditional simulation with machine learning and AI workloads.

The result is a market in which computing capacity has become productive infrastructure in its own right.

The Numbers Are Almost Difficult to Comprehend

Consider the trajectory.

NVIDIA's fiscal Q1 2027 Data Center revenue was $75.2 billion, already up 92% from a year earlier.

Three months later:

$89.0 billion.

That represents an additional $13.8 billion in quarterly Data Center revenue.

Year over year, the increase is approximately $48 billion in a single quarter.

This isn't incremental growth.

It is an infrastructure cycle.

And increasingly, that cycle encompasses the entire computing stack:

GPU → HBM → CPU → networking → storage → rack → cooling → power → data center.

The supercomputer is becoming an integrated industrial system.

Vera Rubin Moves the Industry Beyond the GPU

One of the most significant details in NVIDIA's results is that the company is no longer presenting its future simply as a succession of faster GPUs.

The Vera Rubin platform encompasses CPUs, GPUs, networking, storage, and software designed to operate as a complete AI factory.

NVIDIA says Vera Rubin is ramping into full production, with racks being deployed by customers including CoreWeave, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure and Nebius.

NVIDIA also highlighted Spectrum-6 networking, Vera CPUs, Groq 3 LPX inference accelerators, BlueField-4 infrastructure and its DSX platform for designing and operating AI factories at scale.

This is increasingly recognizable as supercomputer architecture, even when the workload is described as AI rather than traditional HPC.

The dividing line between AI infrastructure and supercomputing infrastructure is becoming increasingly difficult to draw.

And That's Why Server Prices Matter

Now to the question many SuperComputing News readers are likely asking:

Will server prices go up?

The answer appears to be yes, at least for some NVIDIA-based AI systems, and particularly those with large memory configurations.

Before NVIDIA released its results, Reuters reported that some major customers had been told that prices for servers containing NVIDIA AI chips could increase by more than 15% in many cases, with the increases expected for systems shipping in early 2027. The report attributed the increases primarily to soaring memory costs and said configurations involving Vera Rubin and Grace Blackwell would be affected differently depending on memory configuration. Reuters noted that it could not independently verify the report and that NVIDIA had not commented at the time.

That report now looks particularly significant in light of NVIDIA's earnings.

The demand isn't collapsing.

It is accelerating.

And the memory required by these systems is enormous.

The Memory Problem May Be Bigger Than the GPU Problem

This may be the most important hardware story hiding behind NVIDIA's spectacular numbers.

Modern AI accelerators don't operate alone.

They require enormous amounts of high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, to keep their computational engines fed with data.

As accelerator performance increases, memory bandwidth and capacity must increase with it.

That creates a difficult supply-chain equation.

The industry is simultaneously demanding:

  • more GPUs;
  • more HBM;
  • more server DRAM;
  • more CPUs;
  • more networking silicon;
  • more SSDs;
  • more advanced packaging;
  • more substrates;
  • more power infrastructure; and
  • more cooling capacity.

The memory industry is already warning that supply may not expand quickly enough.

Micron has specifically warned that when demand for DRAM or HBM exceeds available supply, manufacturers may have to prioritize production and allocate limited capacity among customers, potentially resulting in elevated pricing and downstream supply-chain disruption.

Will Memory Prices Rise?

This is where the answer becomes more nuanced.

Yes, memory pricing is under pressure, but not every memory product will necessarily rise by the same amount.

The strongest pressure is on AI-oriented memory, particularly HBM.

At the same time, the enormous amount of manufacturing capacity being directed toward AI memory can affect conventional DRAM availability.

Reuters reported in July that average DRAM and NAND prices had already risen substantially amid AI-driven demand, while major memory manufacturers were expanding capacity.

The result is a fascinating feedback loop:

More AI compute → more HBM → more memory capacity devoted to AI → tighter conventional memory supply → higher memory costs → more expensive servers.

And that means NVIDIA's extraordinary success could have consequences far beyond NVIDIA.

The Supercomputer Bill Is Becoming a Memory Bill

Consider a modern rack-scale AI system.

The GPU is the obvious centerpiece.

But the GPU is only one component.

A production AI supercomputer also needs:

HBM + system memory + CPU memory + networking + storage + power delivery + cooling + rack infrastructure.

As systems become more memory-intensive, the cost contribution from memory grows.

This is particularly important because AI workloads are increasingly becoming memory-bound rather than purely compute-bound.

A processor capable of enormous mathematical throughput is useless if the architecture cannot deliver data quickly enough.

That is why HBM has become one of the most strategically important components in the AI infrastructure supply chain.

NVIDIA Is Already Responding to the Memory Challenge

The company's earnings release includes another important clue.

NVIDIA announced a multiyear technology partnership with SK hynix to advance next-generation memory for the global AI factory buildout.

That is not a minor supplier relationship.

It illustrates the degree to which memory has become a strategic component of the computing architecture.

NVIDIA needs the accelerator.

But the accelerator needs memory.

And the memory has to arrive in enormous quantities, at precisely the right performance, packaging and power characteristics.

The AI supercomputer is therefore increasingly a co-designed compute-and-memory system.

The Memory Industry Is Building for the Supercomputing Boom

SK hynix announced earlier this month that it would invest approximately 54 trillion won across new DRAM and NAND facilities in Yongin and Cheongju to expand its production base for growing AI-memory demand. The company said the investments are intended to support the long-term AI memory market and improve supply stability.

That is the kind of investment required when demand is no longer measured in thousands of chips.

It is measured in gigawatts of data-center capacity and millions of accelerators.

The memory industry is effectively becoming part of the supercomputing infrastructure industry.

Could Higher Server Prices Slow Supercomputing?

Not necessarily.

This is where the story becomes optimistic.

If a new generation of AI accelerators delivers substantially more useful work per watt, per rack and per dollar, customers may willingly pay more for the complete system.

In other words:

Higher hardware prices do not automatically mean higher computing costs.

A $10 million system that delivers twice the useful scientific throughput of a $7 million system may be the better investment.

The real metric isn't the purchase price.

It is:

Cost per useful computation.

For HPC, that can mean:

  • time to solution;
  • energy per simulation;
  • cost per training run;
  • cost per inference;
  • scientific productivity per rack; and
  • useful work per megawatt.

That is where the next generation of supercomputing competition will increasingly take place.

Efficiency Could Matter More Than Price

NVIDIA says the Vera Rubin platform is designed for this new environment.

The company's strategy is increasingly focused on complete systems rather than isolated accelerators.

That means combining:

compute + memory + networking + storage + software.

NVIDIA also highlighted that Blackwell led across categories in the MLPerf Training 6.0 benchmarks and AgentPerf, an infrastructure benchmark for agentic AI.

For HPC, benchmark leadership matters, but application efficiency matters even more.

A scientific center doesn't buy an accelerator because it has impressive theoretical specifications.

It buys it because researchers can solve problems faster.

The Supercomputing Industry Is Getting Bigger

NVIDIA's results also reveal how much the potential market has expanded.

The company says 35 new NVIDIA AI HPC supercomputers are in development across Europe.

That's an extraordinary signal for traditional HPC.

AI isn't replacing supercomputing.

It is expanding the market for accelerated computing and bringing HPC-style architectures into new industries.

Scientific research.

Drug discovery.

Climate modeling.

Fusion.

Materials science.

Engineering.

Digital twins.

Robotics.

National security.

Financial modeling.

Every one of these workloads can potentially consume accelerated compute.

The New Supercomputing Economy

There is another reason NVIDIA's results matter.

Earlier this month, NVIDIA announced partnerships with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR to establish financing platforms intended to mobilize more than $500 billion of third-party capital for AI infrastructure. NVIDIA described compute and full-stack AI infrastructure as an investable asset class.

Put that together with today's earnings.

We now have:

Demand.

Capital.

Compute.

Memory.

Infrastructure.

The pieces of a new industrial economy are coming together.

Server Makers May Have More Pricing Power

This is an important consequence for companies building AI servers.

Traditional server manufacturing is typically a competitive, relatively low-margin business.

AI servers are different.

They incorporate extremely expensive accelerators, high-bandwidth memory, advanced networking, sophisticated power delivery and liquid cooling.

When critical components become scarce, the economics of the entire rack change.

The reported 15%-plus price increases are therefore significant, not because every AI server will necessarily rise exactly 15%, but because they demonstrate that the supply chain is gaining the ability to pass rising component costs downstream.

Server makers may have little choice.

If HBM costs rise, someone has to absorb the increase.

It can be:

NVIDIA.

The server manufacturer.

The cloud provider.

The AI company.

Or ultimately:

the customer.

The early indications are that at least some of the cost is being passed along.

But Scarcity Could Also Accelerate Innovation

There is an optimistic side to this.

When a resource becomes expensive, engineers have an enormous incentive to use it more efficiently.

Memory scarcity could accelerate research into:

  • memory compression;
  • sparsity;
  • quantization;
  • better caching;
  • memory pooling;
  • near-memory computing;
  • processing-in-memory;
  • optical interconnects;
  • advanced packaging;
  • larger shared memory architectures;
  • improved software scheduling; and
  • algorithms designed around data locality.

In other words, the memory squeeze could help create better computers.

Supercomputing Is Becoming a Supply-Chain Science

There is a lesson here for HPC administrators.

Building the next supercomputer isn't simply a matter of selecting the fastest processor.

Procurement teams increasingly have to think about:

HBM availability.

DRAM allocation.

Network bandwidth.

Power delivery.

Cooling capacity.

Rack density.

Advanced packaging.

Lead times.

Total cost of ownership.

The machine room itself is becoming part of the computational architecture.

The 1-Gigawatt Supercomputer Is Coming Into View

The industry's scale is also changing the physical definition of a supercomputer.

NVIDIA and its partners are now discussing AI factories at gigawatt scale.

Its recent PORTS-Pike project in Ohio, for example, involves an initial 4.25 IT-gigawatt capacity with an option for another 3.75 IT gigawatts, while OpenAI is expected to be the customer for an 8-IT-gigawatt campus.

That is no longer simply a computer installation.

It is an industrial facility.

Power plants, substations, cooling systems, fiber networks, buildings and semiconductor supply chains all become part of the computer.

The definition of "supercomputer" is expanding accordingly.

A Remarkable Positive Signal for HPC

It would be easy to focus exclusively on the risks:

Memory shortages.

Higher server prices.

Power constraints.

Supply-chain bottlenecks.

Increasing capital requirements.

Those challenges are real.

But NVIDIA's results tell a much more encouraging story.

The world is investing extraordinary amounts of money into computing because computing is producing extraordinary amounts of economic and scientific value.

That is good news for the supercomputing industry.

Every new AI factory expands demand for:

  • accelerators;
  • networking;
  • memory;
  • storage;
  • cooling;
  • power infrastructure;
  • software;
  • system integration;
  • data-center engineering; and
  • computational expertise.

The supercomputing ecosystem is expanding with it.

The Most Important Number May Not Be $96.2 Billion

NVIDIA's $96.2 billion quarter is remarkable.

Its $89 billion Data Center business is even more remarkable.

But perhaps the most important number for SuperComputing News readers is 117%.

That is the year-over-year growth rate of Data Center revenue.

It tells us that the world's appetite for accelerated computing is not merely continuing.

It is accelerating.

And NVIDIA expects another leap, forecasting $108 billion in revenue in the coming quarter.

That means the infrastructure buildout remains in full swing.

The Great Compute Expansion

We may eventually look back at this period as the moment when computing stopped being simply a component of the economy and became one of its fundamental physical resources.

Just as electricity transformed industrial production, abundant computation is transforming scientific discovery, engineering and artificial intelligence.

The difference is that this new infrastructure requires extraordinary amounts of silicon, memory, networking, electricity and cooling.

And that means the next great supercomputing race won't be won by processors alone.

It will be won by whoever can integrate the entire system most effectively.

The Memory Challenge Could Become the Next Supercomputing Opportunity

As computing evolves into an essential economic asset, the industry is shifting from pure performance metrics to revenue-per-compute efficiency. With AI demand driving a massive infrastructure expansion, memory has become a critical bottleneck. The future of the supercomputing economy now hinges on integrating high-bandwidth memory with accelerated compute, where long-term success will be measured by cost-effectiveness and application efficiency rather than raw hardware pricing.

When physics computes: Simulations turn random skyrmion motion into directional information
Featured

When physics computes: Simulations turn random skyrmion motion into directional information

Tyler O'Neal, Staff Editor August 25, 2026, 8:00 am

An international research team led by Waseda University in Japan has used finite-temperature spin-dynamics simulations to show how nanoscale magnetic skyrmions can leverage topology, thermal noise, particle interactions, and engineered geometry to perform computation. This research, published in *npj Spintronics* under the title "Diffusion asymmetry of repulsive skyrmions in a structured environment," challenges the traditional computational paradigm of eliminating noise. Instead, the study suggests that thermal randomness can be harnessed as a functional component of a system. By designing physical structures, specifically, asymmetric nanoscale gates, that interact with the unique dynamics of skyrmions, researchers have shown that physical systems can be engineered to process information directly through their inherent material properties. This represents a significant shift toward unconventional computing architectures, where the physics of the system itself is designed to perform complex computational operations.

The Computational Experiment

The researchers created a simulated nanoscale environment consisting of two chambers connected by an off-center asymmetric gate, or OAG.

The comparison is important.

In a conventional centered symmetric gate, a skyrmion approaching from either direction encounters essentially equivalent geometry.

In the asymmetric configuration, the gate is deliberately displaced from the center of the connecting region.

The simulations then ask a deceptively simple question:

Will thermally driven skyrmions move through the structure equally well in both directions?

The answer is no.

The computational model shows that skyrmions can preferentially diffuse from one chamber to the other. The effect emerges from the combined influence of skyrmion topology, gyrotropic motion, damping, boundary interactions and repulsive skyrmion-skyrmion forces.

This is not a simple mechanical ratchet.

The directional behavior emerges from the interaction of multiple physical effects.

Simulating Magnetic Objects as Computational Particles

Magnetic skyrmions are particularly interesting because their internal spin structure gives them unusual dynamics.

They are topological spin textures, meaning their behavior is governed in part by a topological charge rather than simply by their physical position.

The researchers model skyrmions with topological charge Q = −1.

Their motion includes a gyrotropic component that can cause a skyrmion undergoing thermal Brownian motion to follow curved rather than purely random trajectories.

That becomes critical when the skyrmion encounters a boundary.

Instead of simply bouncing away, the combination of gyrotropic motion and boundary interactions can guide the skyrmion along a wall.

With the gate positioned asymmetrically, the geometry can therefore make passage easier from one direction than the other.

The computer is effectively revealing a nanoscale transport mechanism that would be extraordinarily difficult to understand from geometry alone.

MuMax3 Turns the Physics Into a Numerical Experiment

To test their theoretical predictions, the researchers performed computational spin-dynamics experiments using MuMax3, a micromagnetic simulation package.

At finite temperature, the dynamics are governed by the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation, which describes the evolution of magnetization while incorporating thermal fluctuations.

This is a crucial part of the computational story.

The randomness is not an error term.

It is deliberately included in the model.

The simulation therefore attempts to reproduce the statistical behavior of real thermally fluctuating magnetic structures rather than calculating only an idealized deterministic trajectory.

In the primary simulation configuration, the researchers modeled:

  • 20 skyrmions;
  • topological charge Q = −1;
  • temperature of 150 K;
  • an asymmetric gate width of 36 nanometers; and
  • stochastic thermal fluctuations controlled through random seeds.

The simulations followed the system for hundreds of nanoseconds and examined how many skyrmions crossed between the two chambers.

One Direction Works Better Than the Other

The computational results provide a striking demonstration.

Starting with 20 skyrmions in the left chamber and none in the right, the simulation produced six skyrmions in the right chamber after 500 nanoseconds and nine after 1,000 nanoseconds.

When the initial population was reversed—20 skyrmions in the right chamber and none in the left—only two crossed to the left after 500 nanoseconds and three after 1,000 nanoseconds in the representative simulation.

The system therefore has a preferred diffusion direction.

That preference disappears when the gate is made symmetric.

The comparison between the asymmetric-gate and centered-symmetric-gate systems is what turns the result from an interesting trajectory into a computationally testable physical effect.

The Researchers Had to Prove It Wasn’t Just Random Luck

There is an obvious problem with a thermally driven system.

If the physics contains randomness, how can researchers be sure that an apparent directional effect isn’t simply a statistical accident?

The answer was to repeat the computational experiment.

The researchers performed 100 repetitions using different thermal random seeds while keeping the physical parameters fixed.

This is an important computational methodology.

The objective isn’t to find one simulation that produces an interesting result.

It is to determine whether the statistical behavior survives changes in the random realization of the thermal noise.

The repeated simulations support the persistence of the diffusion asymmetry.

Geometry Becomes a Computing Parameter

One of the most interesting findings is that the gate cannot simply be made arbitrarily narrow or wide.

The ratio between the gate opening and the skyrmion size is critical.

If the gate is too narrow, skyrmions cannot pass.

If it is too wide, the skyrmions pass through without sufficiently interacting with the surrounding geometry.

The simulations identify intermediate regimes where the asymmetric behavior emerges.

In particular, asymmetric diffusion was observed for gate widths of approximately 30–32 nm and 36–38 nm in the modeled system.

This is a fascinating computational result because it means geometry itself becomes a control parameter.

The shape of the device determines how thermal motion is transformed into directional information.

Twenty Skyrmions Are Different From One

The simulations also reveal something that would be absent from a single-particle model.

The skyrmions interact with one another.

Their interactions are predominantly repulsive, but those forces can produce surprisingly complex collective behavior.

Two diffusing skyrmions can temporarily form a kind of rotating bound configuration, producing emergent rotational dynamics even though their mutual interaction is repulsive.

This is important computationally.

The system cannot simply be modeled as 20 independent random walkers.

The motion of one skyrmion affects the environment experienced by another.

The resulting dynamics are therefore many-body and nonlinear.

Density Changes the Computation

The number of skyrmions inside the chambers also matters.

The simulations show that diffusion rates increase with the initial number of skyrmions for both asymmetric and symmetric geometries, although the geometry determines whether the resulting diffusion remains directionally asymmetric.

At very low density, there may be insufficient interaction to produce the effect.

At very high density, however, strong skyrmion-skyrmion repulsion can become so significant that skyrmions may be expelled from a chamber without interacting effectively with the gate.

The researchers found that 20 skyrmions provided a moderate density that maintained the desired asymmetric diffusion behavior in their modeled system.

This means the computational device has another parameter that could potentially be controlled:

information density.

The Simulation Is Time-Dependent

There is another subtle computational complication.

Skyrmions can be thermally annihilated.

Consequently, the total number of skyrmions decreases over time.

As the density changes, so do the skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-wall interactions.

That means the effective diffusion rates are not necessarily constant.

The researchers therefore emphasize that their simulations should be interpreted as a dynamic, evolving system rather than a simple two-state process with fixed transition rates.

The simulations focus particularly on the early 0–500 ns interval, where changes in the effective diffusion rates are smaller and the directional effect can be analyzed more clearly.

This is an important example of why computational physics can become complicated very quickly.

The system is not just random.

It is evolving randomness.

The Thiele Model Helps Explain the Motion

The full spin-dynamics simulations reveal what happens.

The researchers then use the Thiele model to help explain why it happens.

Consider a skyrmion approaching the asymmetric gate from the left.

Its interaction with the gate and upper chamber wall produces a velocity field influenced by gyrotropic and dissipative responses.

In the simulation, the skyrmion can accelerate along the upper wall and eventually enter the opposite chamber.

The reverse trajectory behaves differently.

A skyrmion approaching from the right can be redirected away from the gate and remain trapped in its original chamber.

The numerical experiment and reduced theoretical model therefore complement each other.

The detailed simulation establishes the behavior.

The analytical model helps explain the mechanism.

Damping Turns Out to Matter

The researchers also investigate what happens if the dissipative contribution is removed.

Their Thiele-model analysis shows that when the damping-related term is effectively set to zero, asymmetric diffusion becomes much harder to produce.

The skyrmions can pass through the gate more symmetrically from either side.

This indicates that nonzero damping is an important component of the directional effect.

The result highlights another characteristic of computational physics.

A phenomenon that appears to be caused by geometry alone actually depends on the interaction of:

geometry + topology + thermal noise + gyrotropic motion + damping + boundary forces.

Remove one component and the behavior can change dramatically.

Randomness Becomes a Resource

This is where the work becomes particularly interesting for computing.

Traditional computer engineering generally attempts to suppress randomness.

Digital logic depends on reproducible states.

Noise is usually treated as something that must be minimized.

The skyrmion system suggests another possibility.

A carefully engineered physical structure can transform thermal fluctuations into a statistically useful directional process.

The researchers point out that asymmetric diffusion in physical systems could provide a route toward nonlinear, noise-assisted and geometry-controlled information processing.

That connects directly to the broader field of unconventional computing.

From Spintronics to Neuromorphic Computing

Neuromorphic computing attempts to emulate some characteristics of biological information processing using physical systems that can naturally represent complex, dynamic states.

Skyrmions are attractive candidates because they can move, interact, fluctuate and respond to their environment.

The new work suggests that their behavior could potentially be manipulated statistically rather than forcing every skyrmion into a perfectly deterministic trajectory.

That is conceptually important.

A future computational device might not ask:

Did the skyrmion move left or right?

It might ask:

What information is encoded in the probability distribution of where the skyrmions move?

That is a very different computational paradigm.

Reservoir Computing Without Conventional Digital Logic

The paper’s references point to previous demonstrations of Brownian reservoir computing using geometrically confined skyrmion dynamics, as well as gesture-recognition experiments using skyrmion-based Brownian reservoir computing.

Reservoir computing is particularly interesting because the physical system itself performs a nonlinear transformation of input signals.

Instead of explicitly programming every internal operation, the dynamics of the physical reservoir provide a complex computational state space.

The new asymmetric-diffusion mechanism could potentially add another useful ingredient:

controlled directional transport generated by stochastic physical dynamics.

The researchers are not claiming that this study has produced a complete computer.

Rather, it identifies a physical mechanism that could contribute to future unconventional architectures.

That distinction is important.

A Computational Device Built From Probability

The deeper idea is almost philosophical.

Conventional computing asks engineers to create predictable operations from predictable states.

This research explores whether engineers can instead create predictable statistics from unpredictable microscopic events.

That distinction could be valuable for specialized computing workloads.

Thermal fluctuations are unavoidable at nanoscale dimensions.

Instead of treating them entirely as a liability, future devices might exploit them.

The geometry acts as the algorithm.

The skyrmion dynamics provide the nonlinear transformation.

Thermal noise supplies stochasticity.

And the resulting probability distribution becomes the computational output.

Why This Matters for Future AI Hardware

Artificial intelligence increasingly requires computing systems that can perform enormous numbers of operations under tight energy constraints.

Conventional transistor scaling alone may not provide the efficiency improvements required indefinitely.

That has driven research into alternative approaches including analog computing, in-memory computing, neuromorphic architectures, photonic processors and spintronic systems.

Skyrmion-based computing belongs to this broader search for architectures that use physical processes more directly.

The Waseda-led study is particularly interesting because it demonstrates that device geometry can shape stochastic information flow.

Instead of designing a circuit entirely from deterministic gates, one could potentially design physical landscapes in which particles naturally perform useful transformations.

The Supercomputing Connection

There is an important nuance for the HPC community.

The paper does not present a conventional “supercomputer achieved X petaflops” breakthrough.

The significance is different.

Computational modeling is being used to discover and engineer new computing physics.

The researchers use numerical spin dynamics to explore a parameter space involving temperature, skyrmion density, gate geometry, interactions and stochastic fluctuations.

They then use statistical repetition and reduced theoretical modeling to identify robust physical behavior.

This is exactly the kind of computational workflow increasingly important across modern science:

simulate → observe → vary parameters → repeat statistically → identify mechanism → design new experiment or technology.

When the Algorithm Is the Physics

The most exciting possibility is that the eventual computational device may look very different from today’s processors.

Instead of billions of transistors executing precisely defined Boolean operations, a future unconventional processor could contain physical structures whose collective dynamics naturally transform information.

The software could encode an input into the physical system.

The skyrmions could evolve.

Thermal fluctuations could provide controlled stochasticity.

Geometry could bias the resulting trajectories.

Sensors could measure the distribution of final states.

And machine-learning algorithms could interpret those states.

In such a system, the physics becomes part of the algorithm.

A Tiny Magnetic System With a Big Computational Idea

The physical structures in this study are nanoscale.

The gate widths producing the strongest asymmetric diffusion are measured in tens of nanometers.

Yet the computational implications are much larger.

The research demonstrates that carefully engineered nanoscale environments can convert a fundamental physical process—Brownian diffusion—into a directional and potentially information-bearing phenomenon.

It is a reminder that the future of computing may not necessarily be found by making conventional processors ever larger.

It may be found by making computation increasingly physical, parallel, stochastic and specialized.

The Road to Practical Hardware Is Still Long

The researchers themselves identify important limitations and areas for future work.

The diffusion rate depends on skyrmion density and can change as skyrmions are thermally annihilated.

The gate geometry cannot easily be changed after fabrication.

Skyrmion size and density, however, can respond to thermal conditions and external magnetic fields.

The study also suggests future investigations of other skyrmion types and interaction regimes.

Therefore, this is not a finished computing technology.

It is a computationally demonstrated physical mechanism.

And that may be precisely why it is interesting.

The Future May Compute With Noise

For decades, computing has been a story about controlling physics.

Control the electron.

Control the transistor.

Control the voltage.

Control the bit.

But as computing moves into the nanoscale and researchers search for new architectures beyond conventional CMOS, another philosophy is emerging:

Don’t necessarily control every microscopic event. Control the statistical behavior of the system.

The skyrmion simulations from Waseda and its collaborators provide a compelling example.

Twenty nanoscale magnetic structures are allowed to move under thermal fluctuations.

Their topology bends their trajectories.

Their mutual interactions alter their motion.

A carefully positioned gate biases their diffusion.

And a computational experiment reveals that the resulting randomness can become directional information.

From Random Motion to Useful Computation

The broader significance of this research can be encapsulated in a single principle: geometry serves as a mechanism to transform noise into computation. The study demonstrates that asymmetric diffusion emerges only when specific conditions regarding skyrmion size, gate dimensions, boundary geometry, damping, thermal fluctuations, and particle density are met. Because this effect is negated by restrictive, overly open, or symmetric configurations, the physical environment itself functions as a critical computational design parameter, a development with promising implications for the future of spintronics and unconventional AI hardware. While the researchers have not developed a direct replacement for current GPUs, they have established a fundamental insight through detailed computational modeling: nanoscale physical systems can effectively harness randomness to generate structured information. As the demand for computational power rises alongside the need for greater energy efficiency, this approach may redefine the architecture of future processors, shifting from traditional logic gate operations to systems that leverage fundamental physical processes for computation.

Supercomputing reveals why some black hole flares fade away
Featured

Supercomputing reveals why some black hole flares fade away

CHRIS O'NEAL, PUBLISHER August 24, 2026, 8:00 am

Hydrodynamical simulations show that a rapidly spinning star can survive repeated encounters with a supermassive black hole while producing progressively weaker flares, potentially revealing how the star was captured in the first place.

Some black holes exhibit a particularly destructive mechanism for tracking time. When a star ventures too close, gravitational forces strip away its outer layers; the resulting debris falls toward the black hole, generating a brilliant flare. Months or years later, the surviving star may return, initiating the cycle anew.
 
Astronomers have observed a perplexing trend in several of these systems: each successive flare often diminishes in intensity. Recently, researchers at Syracuse University and their collaborators utilized hydrodynamical simulations to identify a potential contributing factor: the star may have been rotating at a high velocity prior to its initial encounter with the black hole.
 
For SuperComputing News, the primary significance of this study extends beyond the potential explanation of an astronomical mystery. It underscores how researchers have employed computational hydrodynamics to simulate an extreme gravitational experiment, one impossible to replicate in a laboratory setting, to discover that a star's evolutionary history may be encoded within the attenuation of its repeated flares.

When a Star Survives the Impossible

A conventional tidal disruption event occurs when a star ventures sufficiently close to a supermassive black hole that the difference in gravitational force across the star overwhelms its self-gravity.

The star is stretched and ultimately destroyed.

Its debris begins falling back toward the black hole, releasing enormous amounts of energy and producing a transient flare that allows astronomers to study an otherwise invisible black hole.

But some stars survive.

In a repeating partial tidal disruption event, or rpTDE, the star loses only part of its mass during each close passage. Its surviving core remains gravitationally bound and returns for another encounter months or years later. 

That makes rpTDEs extraordinarily valuable.

Astronomers effectively get multiple observations of the same star-black-hole interaction.

And that is where the mystery begins.

The Fading-Flare Problem

There are roughly ten known repeating systems of this general type, and about four have displayed progressively dimmer flares. 

At first glance, the explanation seems obvious.

If the star loses less material during each encounter, there should be less material available to produce the next flare.

Less fuel should mean less light.

But previous hydrodynamical simulations produced an unexpected result.

Although the amount of stripped material decreased, the predicted peak flare brightness could remain approximately constant.

Why?

Because the black hole does more than remove mass.

It also spins the star up.

The black hole's tidal field exerts a torque on the surviving stellar core. As the star's rotation increases, stripped material can return toward the black hole on a shorter timescale.

That faster fallback can compensate for the declining amount of material.

The result is surprisingly persistent flare brightness.

The simulations therefore produced a prediction that did not match the progressively fading flares observed in some real systems. 

The researchers needed another variable.

They found it in the star's initial spin.

A Computational Experiment in Stellar Spin

The new study, published in The Astrophysical Journal, tests high-mass main-sequence stars repeatedly disrupted by a 10-million-solar-mass black hole.

Actually, the simulations use a (10^6)-solar-mass supermassive black hole, one million times the mass of the Sun. 

That distinction matters because the computational experiment is deliberately controlled.

The researchers vary the star's initial rotation and examine what happens as it repeatedly passes the black hole.

The simulations show that rapidly rotating, prograde stars, stars whose spin is aligned with their orbital angular momentum, can produce weaker outbursts successively.

The required initial rotation is on the order of tens of percent of the star's breakup speed, the point at which centrifugal forces become strong enough to approach gravitational binding at the stellar surface. 

This is the crucial computational result.

The model finally reproduces the qualitative behavior astronomers have been seeing:

less mass lost → similar fallback timescale → lower peak fallback rate → dimmer flare.

Why Spin Changes the Calculation

The physics is subtle.

Consider a slowly rotating star.

During its first close encounter, the black hole's tidal forces strip material from the star and transfer angular momentum into the surviving core.

The star begins spinning faster.

On subsequent encounters, that additional spin changes the dynamics of the stripped material.

The fallback timescale decreases.

Consequently, even though the star is losing less mass, the material returns more rapidly.

That can preserve the peak fallback rate, and therefore preserve the brightness of subsequent flares.

Now start the experiment with a star that is already rapidly rotating.

There is less room for the black hole to spin it up significantly.

The fallback timescale therefore changes much less from one encounter to the next.

As the star loses progressively less mass, the peak fallback rate declines.

And the flare gets dimmer.

The computational model has effectively identified the missing initial condition required to reproduce the astronomical observations. 

Hydrodynamics at the Extreme

This is precisely the kind of problem for which numerical astrophysics becomes indispensable.

There is no laboratory capable of reproducing a stellar interior being repeatedly distorted by the tidal field of a million-solar-mass black hole.

The researchers instead solve the underlying fluid-dynamical problem computationally.

Their simulations follow the interaction of:

  • stellar structure;
  • self-gravity;
  • the black hole's tidal field;
  • orbital motion;
  • stellar rotation;
  • angular-momentum transfer;
  • mass stripping; and
  • the subsequent fallback of stellar debris.

The current study builds on a broader research program using hydrodynamical simulations to understand repeated stellar mass loss in rpTDEs. Previous work demonstrated that the survivability of a star depends strongly on its internal structure and that high-mass, centrally concentrated stars can survive repeated encounters. 

But mapping every possible combination of stellar mass, structure, orbit and encounter parameters through full hydrodynamic calculations is itself computationally prohibitive.

The researchers have therefore also developed intermediate analytical and hybrid models to explore regions of parameter space that would be impractical to simulate directly. 

That is an important HPC lesson:

The challenge isn't merely running one enormous simulation. It is efficiently exploring the space of possible universes.

The Black Hole Is Also a Stellar Spin-Up Machine

The simulations reveal something counterintuitive.

The black hole is not simply destroying the star.

It is changing the star's internal rotational state.

Every close passage transfers angular momentum.

That means the history of previous encounters affects the outcome of future encounters.

In computational terms, the system has memory.

The initial conditions matter.

The state of the star after encounter one becomes the initial condition for encounter two.

Encounter two changes the state used for encounter three.

And so on.

This is precisely why simple static models are inadequate.

The researchers need a dynamic, evolving computational representation of the star.

A Million-Solar-Mass Laboratory

The simulated black hole has a mass of approximately one million Suns.

The stellar models include main-sequence stars of at least one solar mass, and the calculations examine repeated partial disruptions under different stellar-spin conditions. 

The computational experiment effectively asks:

What happens if we change only the star's rotational state?

That controlled numerical experiment is enormously powerful.

The researchers found that high, prograde initial spins naturally generate the progressively dimmer outbursts seen in observations.

By contrast, the previously modeled spin-up of initially slower stars tends to counteract the declining mass loss.

This provides a physical explanation for why seemingly similar stellar encounters can generate very different flare histories.

The Star's Spin May Reveal Its Past

The story becomes even more interesting when the researchers ask a second question:

Why was the star spinning so rapidly before it ever met the black hole?

The proposed answer is the Hills mechanism.

Imagine two stars orbiting each other in a very tight binary.

The binary wanders too close to a supermassive black hole.

The black hole's enormous tidal field tears the binary apart.

One star is ejected at high velocity.

The other becomes gravitationally captured by the black hole.

This is known as Hills capture.

And there is a crucial consequence.

A close binary can become tidally locked, meaning each star rotates at approximately the same rate that it orbits its companion.

The tighter the binary, the faster that rotation.

Therefore, when the black hole destroys the binary and captures one member, the captured star can enter its new orbit already spinning rapidly. 

The same event could therefore explain two otherwise puzzling properties:

Why is the star spinning so rapidly?

Why is it on such a tight orbit around the black hole?

Supercomputing Connects the Clues

This is where the study becomes particularly compelling from a computational-science perspective.

The simulation isn't simply producing a prettier visualization of a tidal disruption event.

It is connecting multiple physical phenomena:

binary dynamics → stellar rotation → black-hole capture → repeated tidal stripping → angular-momentum transfer → fallback dynamics → flare luminosity.

That is a complex chain of causality.

And numerical modeling makes it possible to follow that chain.

The computer effectively lets researchers rewind the system and ask what initial conditions could have produced the behavior astronomers see today.

From Stellar Spin to Observable Light

One of the most useful aspects of the calculation is the connection between an internal property of a star and an observable astronomical signal.

Astronomers cannot easily measure the star's initial rotation directly.

But they can observe its flares.

That means the computational model creates a bridge:

Initial stellar spin → hydrodynamic interaction → mass stripping → fallback rate → flare brightness.

If the simulated relationship is correct, the light curve itself becomes an indirect probe of stellar rotation.

A fading sequence of flares could therefore reveal something about a star's history long before it encountered the black hole.

The Computational Challenge of Repeating Encounters

A single tidal encounter is already an extreme hydrodynamic problem.

A repeating event is harder.

The star must be evolved through one encounter, allowed to respond internally, placed back onto its orbit and then brought through another close passage.

Its mass, density profile, rotation and internal structure are no longer identical to the previous encounter.

That makes the calculation inherently time-dependent.

The researchers' previous simulations showed that high-mass, centrally concentrated stars can survive relatively small amounts of mass loss and continue through multiple encounters. 

This creates a computational feedback loop:

tidal stripping changes the star → the changed star responds differently to the next tidal encounter.

That is precisely the sort of nonlinear behavior that numerical hydrodynamics is designed to capture.

Why This Matters Beyond One Black Hole

The implications may extend into the center of our own galaxy.

Syracuse researchers point out that Hills capture may also have produced some of the stars orbiting Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. 

If so, the same dynamical process could help explain both distant repeating tidal-disruption events and some unusual stellar populations in the Galactic Center.

That makes the computational model potentially relevant far beyond the specific systems that motivated the study.

A New Kind of Astronomical Forensics

There is a broader scientific idea here that deserves attention.

Astronomers often think of observations as snapshots of the Universe.

Computational astrophysics can turn those snapshots into forensic evidence.

A fading flare isn't simply a measurement of brightness.

It contains information about:

  • how much stellar material was removed;
  • how quickly that material returned;
  • how the star was rotating;
  • how angular momentum was transferred;
  • how the star's structure changed;
  • and potentially how the star arrived in its orbit.

The simulation allows researchers to decode those clues.

The Supercomputing Lesson

This research illustrates an increasingly important role for HPC in astrophysics.

The breakthrough isn't necessarily a new telescope or a larger detector.

It is the ability to construct a numerical experiment complicated enough to connect microscopic stellar dynamics with macroscopic astronomical observations.

The Universe supplies the event.

The telescope records the light.

The supercomputer works out what had to happen in between.

And in this case, the answer may be that the star was already spinning rapidly when it entered the black hole's deadly orbit.

A Black Hole's Flare as a Computational Fingerprint

The researchers' result offers a striking new interpretation of fading rpTDEs.

The progressively weaker flares may not simply mean that the star is running out of material.

They may be telling us something about the star's rotational history.

A rapidly spinning, prograde star produces the right combination of mass loss and fallback behavior to reproduce the observed decline. 

And that rapid rotation may itself be evidence of a much earlier encounter with a binary companion.

In other words, a black hole flare could carry a fingerprint of a star's life before the star ever met the black hole.

The Universe's Most Extreme Computer Experiment

Recent research from Syracuse University provides a compelling explanation for the phenomenon of fading black hole flares during repeating partial tidal disruption events. While standard models previously suggested that flare brightness should remain relatively constant due to angular momentum transfer, which offsets mass loss by accelerating debris fallback, new hydrodynamical simulations indicate that a star's initial rotation is the decisive factor. 

The study demonstrates that stars beginning their orbit with rapid, prograde rotation possess limited capacity for further spin-up during gravitational encounters. Consequently, as these stars lose mass over successive passages, the lack of an accelerated fallback mechanism leads to a measurable decline in peak flare brightness. These findings suggest that the initial high-speed rotation is likely a byproduct of the Hills mechanism, where a captured star retains the rotational momentum from its former binary companion. By utilizing these advanced computational models, scientists can now effectively bridge the gap between observed light patterns and a star's evolutionary history, using the cadence of fading flares to decode the conditions surrounding the star's initial capture.

  • The next supercomputing breakthrough may come from memory, not compute
  • 1
  • 2
Page 1 of 2
POPULAR RIGHT NOW
  • AI supercharges the hunt for stronger magnets: Iowa State researchers launch a new era of intelligent materials discovery
    AI supercharges the hunt for stronger magnets: Iowa State researchers launch a new era of intelligent materials discovery
  • IBM's Historic stock collapse raises questions for the future of enterprise supercomputing
    IBM's Historic stock collapse raises questions for the future of enterprise supercomputing
  • Could a novel dark matter theory simultaneously resolve multiple cosmic enigmas? Supercomputer simulations provide a compelling, albeit currently unverified, potential solution
    Could a novel dark matter theory simultaneously resolve multiple cosmic enigmas? Supercomputer simulations provide a compelling, albeit currently unverified, potential solution
  • Melting icebergs may be reshaping Earth’s greatest ocean current
    Melting icebergs may be reshaping Earth’s greatest ocean current
  • Supercomputers replace ‘bathtub’ flood maps with physics-based digital twins of Britain’s coastline
    Supercomputers replace ‘bathtub’ flood maps with physics-based digital twins of Britain’s coastline
  • Supercomputers push neural quantum simulation beyond previous limits
    Supercomputers push neural quantum simulation beyond previous limits
  • Intel’s AI supercomputing revival: Q2 financial surge signals new era for CPU-powered HPC infrastructure
    Intel’s AI supercomputing revival: Q2 financial surge signals new era for CPU-powered HPC infrastructure
  • AI infrastructure financing fears shake semiconductor sector
    AI infrastructure financing fears shake semiconductor sector
  • AWS supercomputing investment reaches historic scale as Amazon’s AI strategy powers record financial results
    AWS supercomputing investment reaches historic scale as Amazon’s AI strategy powers record financial results
  • Catching the wave of the future: Supercomputers unlock the hidden dynamics of Venus
    Catching the wave of the future: Supercomputers unlock the hidden dynamics of Venus
THIS YEAR'S MOST READ
  • Wall Street wants to trade supercomputing power like oil
    Wall Street wants to trade supercomputing power like oil
  • Beamforming the future: BeammWave's 6G push signals the rise of orbital-terrestrial wireless networks
    Joakim Axmon
    Joakim Axmon
  • Cosmic ambition at scale: UK’s supercomputer unlocks a 2.5 petabytes universe
    Cosmic ambition at scale: UK’s supercomputer unlocks a 2.5 petabytes universe
  • Hidden order, revealed at scale: Supercomputing, electron ptychography uncover the inner workings of relaxor ferroelectrics
    Hidden order, revealed at scale: Supercomputing, electron ptychography uncover the inner workings of relaxor ferroelectrics
  • Intel's Q1 results signal supercomputing surge driving Xeon momentum
    Intel's Q1 results signal supercomputing surge driving Xeon momentum
  • When stars fall apart: Supercomputing reveals the hidden physics of black holes
    When stars fall apart: Supercomputing reveals the hidden physics of black holes
  • MIT develops computational framework to probe dark matter via gravitational waves
    MIT develops computational framework to probe dark matter via gravitational waves
  • Explainable AI moves into the watershed: FAMU-FSU engineers build predictive framework for real-time E. coli forecasting
    FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Assistant Professor Nasrin Alamdari. (Scott Holstein/FAMU-FSU College of Engineering)
    FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Assistant Professor Nasrin Alamdari. (Scott Holstein/FAMU-FSU College of Engineering)
  • Multi-layer simulations reveal the hidden supply chain of solar prominences
    Multi-layer simulations reveal the hidden supply chain of solar prominences
  • Japanese scientists decode dolphin speed with supercomputing: Turbulence, vortices, and the hidden physics of propulsion
    Japanese scientists decode dolphin speed with supercomputing: Turbulence, vortices, and the hidden physics of propulsion
MOST READ OF ALL-TIME
  • Largest Computational Biology Simulation Mimics The Ribosome
    Details
    112152
    The amino acid (green) slithers into the chemical reaction center, moving through an evolutionarily ancient corridor of the ribosome (purple). The amino acid is delivered to the reaction core by the transfer RNA molecule (yellow).
    The amino acid (green) slithers into the chemical reaction center, moving through an evolutionarily ancient corridor of the ribosome (purple). The amino acid is delivered to the reaction core by the transfer RNA molecule (yellow).
  • Silicon 'neurons' may add a new dimension to chips
    Details
    81097
    Silicon 'neurons' may add a new dimension to chips
  • Linux Networx Accelerators Expected to Drive up to 4x Price/Performance
    Details
    75593
  • Complex Concepts That Really Add Up
    Details
    73741
    Complex Concepts That Really Add Up
  • Blue Sky Studios Donates Animation SuperComputer to Wesleyan
    Details
    68197
    Each rack holds 52 Angstrom Microsystem-brand “blades,” with a memory footprint of 12 or 24 gigabytes each. (Photos by Olivia Bartlett Drake)
    Each rack holds 52 Angstrom Microsystem-brand “blades,” with a memory footprint of 12 or 24 gigabytes each. (Photos by Olivia Bartlett Drake)
  • Humanities, HPC connect at NERSC
    Details
    58006
  • TeraGrid ’09 'Call for Participation'
    Details
    55009
  • Turbulence responsible for black holes' balancing act
    Details
    52374
  • Cray Wins $52 Million SuperComputer Contract
    Details
    50187
  • SDSC Researchers Accurately Predict Protein Docking
    Details
    46145
  • FRONTPAGE
  • LATEST
  • POPULAR
  • REGISTER
  • SOCIAL
  • VIDEO
  • SUBSCRIPTION
  • RSS
  • GUIDELINES
  • PRIVACY
  • TOS
  • ABOUT
  • +1 (816) 799-4488
  • editorial@supercomputingonline.com
© 2001 - 2026 SuperComputingOnline.com, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Sign In
  • FRONT PAGE
  • LATEST
    • MEDIA KIT
    • MOST READ
    • RSS FEED
    • ACADEMIA
    • AEROSPACE
    • APPLICATIONS
    • ASTRONOMY
    • AUTOMOTIVE
    • BIG DATA
    • BIOLOGY
    • CHEMISTRY
    • CLIENTS
    • CLOUD
    • DEFENSE
    • DEVELOPER TOOLS
    • EARTH SCIENCES
    • ECONOMICS
    • ENGINEERING
    • ENTERTAINMENT
    • HEALTH
    • INDUSTRY
    • INTERCONNECTS
    • GAMING
    • GOVERNMENT
    • MANUFACTURING
    • MIDDLEWARE
    • MOVIES
    • NETWORKS
    • OIL & GAS
    • PHYSICS
    • PROCESSORS
    • RETAIL
    • SCIENCE
    • STORAGE
    • SYSTEMS
    • VISUALIZATION
  • VIDEOS
    • ADD YOUR VIDEOS
    • MANAGE VIDEOS
  • COMMUNITY
    • TRADE SHOWS
    • SOCIAL NETWORK VIDEOS
    • SURVEYS
    • APPLICATIONS BROWSER
    • CONVERSATION INBOX
    • SOCIAL ADVERTISER
    • GROUPS
    • MARKETPLACE LISTINGS
    • PAGES
    • LEADERBOARD
    • POINTS LISTING
      • BADGES
    • PRIVACY CONFIRM REQUEST
    • PRIVACY CREATE REQUEST

Hey there! We noticed you’re using an ad blocker.